NEW DELHI: Sujata Bhat, who had previously alleged that her daughter Ananya disappeared from the Dharmasthala temple premises in 2003, had reportedly expressed her desire to withdraw the complaint during the Special Investigation Team's (SIT) interrogation.
During the interrogation on Friday, the SIT found Sujata's statement to be contradictory to her earlier claims, suggesting she was lying and obstructing the legal process. Investigators noted that she appeared to be under significant pressure and was struggling with the sustained interrogation, PTI reported.
While Sujata had earlier claimed that the disappearance of her daughter was part of a larger conspiracy, she disclosed the names of certain individuals allegedly involved in it on Friday.
However, the SIT officials did not confirm the details, stating that the disclosures are being verified.
The case has drawn widespread attention following allegations that the narrative of a missing girl may have been fabricated. The SIT's ongoing efforts focus on verifying Sujata’s claims and finding evidence to substantiate the complaint.
Legal experts said even if Sujata formally withdraws her complaint, the SIT would likely continue the investigation, as the matter involves serious allegations and has already entered the judicial process.
The case, which has triggered political sparring and public debates, remains under close watch, with the SIT expected to submit an interim report in the coming weeks, said a senior police official.
During the interrogation on Friday, the SIT found Sujata's statement to be contradictory to her earlier claims, suggesting she was lying and obstructing the legal process. Investigators noted that she appeared to be under significant pressure and was struggling with the sustained interrogation, PTI reported.
While Sujata had earlier claimed that the disappearance of her daughter was part of a larger conspiracy, she disclosed the names of certain individuals allegedly involved in it on Friday.
However, the SIT officials did not confirm the details, stating that the disclosures are being verified.
The case has drawn widespread attention following allegations that the narrative of a missing girl may have been fabricated. The SIT's ongoing efforts focus on verifying Sujata’s claims and finding evidence to substantiate the complaint.
Legal experts said even if Sujata formally withdraws her complaint, the SIT would likely continue the investigation, as the matter involves serious allegations and has already entered the judicial process.
The case, which has triggered political sparring and public debates, remains under close watch, with the SIT expected to submit an interim report in the coming weeks, said a senior police official.
You may also like
Bombay HC Dismisses Air India Employees' Petitions, Rules They Are Not Maintainable Post-Privatisation
Subtle dinner table habit could be symptom of silent killer dementia
Bombay HC Disposes Lavasa Corporation Pleas Against MoEFCC Orders, PILs Alleging Irregularities Still Pending
'Diplomatic embarrassment': Hours before tariff ruling,Trump team sought delay - what they told court
Two popular UK caravan parks to open over Christmas and New Year for first time ever